DEVELOPMENTS IN WORLD TRADE

Is there a notion that falls more under the meaning than that of the market? First, because the market is part of our daily life: if nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is bought, and everything is sold because it is transformed … except in exceptional cases. Without a penny, no cash, no checks or plastic money, we are nothing: we go to the market, we go to the market, the headlines of the press, major radio or television programs, politicians talk to you The laws of the market, the strength of the market. Some will speak of the dictatorship of the market, of the necessary adaptation to the market. We will talk about the capital market, the financial markets, the Euro market, the fruit and vegetable market, leisure, and now the health market. The policy itself is full of market: The single European market and the single currency are indeed political creations. The budget is in deficit; The state is indebted and has to refinance itself at the market price … At best we imagine the market, we have an idea. But its material reality, its definition are far from obvious, while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? The single currency are indeed political creations. The budget is in deficit; The state is indebted and has to refinance itself at the market price … At best we imagine the market, we have an idea. But its material reality, its definition are far from obvious, while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? The single currency are indeed political creations. The budget is in deficit; The state is indebted and has to refinance itself at the market price … At best we imagine the market, we have an idea. But its material reality, its definition are far from obvious, while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? The state is indebted and has to refinance itself at the market price … At best we imagine the market, we have an idea. But its material reality, its definition are far from obvious, while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? The state is indebted and has to refinance itself at the market price

… At best we imagine the market, we have an idea. But its material reality, its definition are far from obvious, while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? Be evident while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? Be evident while its existence is obvious. So how do we apprehend this reality that nobody has seen, but that everyone lives? How is it finally to be understood as a choice of society? We say, for example: “We have to adapt to the market”. But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us? But why should we adapt to something that would be our creation? And if it is not our creation, by what means is this reality able to impose itself on us?